Here’s a summary of the Michael Schmidt raw milk story from Simone Gabbay, RNCP, writing for the Edgar Cayce Diet Plan:
On December 20, 2006, Ontario farmer Michael Schmidt ended a nearly month-long hunger strike during which he had consumed nothing but water and one glass of raw milk each day. Schmidt stopped eating on November 21, after his farm in Durham, Ontario, was raided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, his equipment was confiscated, and he was charged with operating a milk processing plant without a licence. The real grievance, however, is that Schmidt’s milk is not pasteurized.
The sale of raw, unpasteurized milk is illegal in Ontario , but farmers are allowed to drink raw milk from their own cattle. And by extension, those who own cows or shares in a “cow-share” program may do so as well. Taking full advantage of this loophole, Schmidt’s loyal customers have become part-owners by purchasing a share in one of his cows. They pay him $2 a litre for raw milk from the co-owned cows.
My friend Andrea has been drinking Schmidt’s organic raw milk for several years, and she is convinced of its health benefits. Having once suffered from serious allergies and dairy intolerance, she now has no problem digesting and assimilating raw milk. In fact, she believes that drinking the raw milk from Schmidt’s grass-fed cows has helped her overcome her allergies. She tirelessly drives several kilometres each week to pick up her supply of the milk, eggs, and butter from Schmidt’s farm.
Lack of time and inability to commit to a regular milk pick-up prevent me from following Andrea’s example, but I fully support Schmidt’s efforts to make raw, unpasteurized milk available to those who want it. I had the good fortune to grow up on raw milk, which was ubiquitously available in the small mountain village in southern Bavaria where I spent my childhood. Everybody drank raw milk, and allergies were virtually unknown. And no one became sick because they consumed unpasteurized milk.
Raw milk is one of nature’s perfect foods, containing important enzymes that facilitate the digestion of the nutrients in milk. The denatured, pasteurized version most of us are forced to purchase today is devoid of these natural components and is one of the reasons why so many people are unable to digest milk products and develop allergies and various other health problems. When properly handled, raw milk is not contaminated and does not pose a health risk.
Although pasteurization ensures that the potential risk of pathological bacteria present in raw milk is eliminated, it does so at a cost. It also kills beneficial bacteria and thereby effectively promotes pathogens. In addition, it destroys vitamins C, B12, and B6, and it denatures milk proteins. One of the enzymes destroyed by pasteurization is lipase, which helps to digest the fats found in dairy products, which in turn are essential for the assimilation of important nutrients such as calcium.
Proponents of raw milk, for instance the respected Weston A. Price Foundation in the U.S. ( www.westonaprice.org ), claim that modern sterilization and refrigeration procedures make pasteurization unnecessary. The sale of raw milk is allowed in several countries around the world, including parts of the U.S. , the U.K. , France , Germany , and Italy . In many cases, it is regulated, and the raw milk being sold in those must be certified. Certification and regulation of production would legalize the sale of raw milk in Ontario , and it is towards this goal that Michael Schmidt had committed to a hunger strike.
Although he failed to achieve his objective, he is convinced that his protest was successful in drawing attention to the issue, which will ultimately result in change. Indeed, Schmidt’s raw milk campaign was widely featured in the media and drew the support of such notables as Ontario ‘s Finance Minister Greg Sorbara, who is one of Schmidt’s customers. Several celebrity chefs, including Jamie Kennedy, also publicly supported Michael Schmidt’s raw milk crusade.
I applaud the courage of Michael Schmidt and those who are willing to stand up for choice and endorse his natural farming practices and products. Our governments give their blessing to countless toxic chemicals being dumped on our farm fields and into animal feed every day, with terrible consequences for consumers’ health. But they go after one small farmer who produces a simple, organic food that supports human health instead of destroying it. Where is the logic and justice in this? It is appalling that those of us who want natural, unprocessed foods for ourselves and our families are facing constant harassment from uninformed government agencies forcing their blind agendas on the public….”