DATCP seeks to subpoena journalists for new Vernon Herschberger trial

During one of Michael Schmidt’s trials, a Toronto Sun journalist was called to the stand to give testimony about an interview he had done with Michael just the day before. In this case, the Sun clearly didn’t want to make an issue about it. A quick call to the office to clear it with superiors seemed to be all that was needed. The request was made in that morning, and the reporter was testifying the very same afternoon. Not that it’s a practice we’d want to encourage, for all the many reason David cites in his story.

From David E. Gumpert, on the Complete Patient blog:

“A lawyer for one of the journalists, working for a Wisconsin NBC television station, argued that the subpoena shouldn’t be issued since the reporter’s “testimony is not relevant, let  alone ‘highly relevant,’ because he did not observe the purported crime.” The lawyer, Drew Shenkman, with a Washington, DC, firm, added,  “Moreover, the State has failed  to show that  the  information  sought ‘is not  obtainable from  any alternative source,’…as the continued sale of  raw milk products can be shown through countless other sources.”  

Shenkman said there were “many untapped alternative sources…available to the state…” including members of Hershberger’s private food club and current  and former employees.

One of the Wisconsin prosecutors, Eric Defort, rebutted that the reporter  with  the NBC affiliate could have important testimony about  a key  event  in  the Hershberger case–his breaking of the DATCP seals, placed on coolers June 2, 2010, and intended  to prevent the  farmer from distributing products to his club members. Since  the  reporter  was at  the  farm on June 3,  2010, filming  a  report, his “observation that  they  were broken on June 3, 2010…is highly  relevant as to when the seals were broken by Mr. Hershberger…”

Read more on The Complete Patient.

The reality  is that there is no disagreement about  what  happened with  the seals. Hershberger has admitted any number of times that he broke the seals. Which begs  the  question: Why is DATCP making a major issue out  of forcing journalists  to testify for  the prosecution,  in  defiance of all  convention? …”

One wonders, why are the DATCP so much in the raw milk news these days? Is it because dairying is so big in Wisconsin? Is that why the “powers that be” seem to be going all out to establish landmark precedents there? Not long ago we heard about the demise of the Zinniker farm’s raw milk program, also at the hands of the DATCP. 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under News

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s